Murari Sharma: Europe is edging towards a catastrophe

I am afraid that Europe is sleepwalking into a catastrophe.

The Cold War, through its threat of mutually assured destruction, had saved Europe for decades. After the post-Cold War lull, connoisseurs of war have raised their ominous head again.

War has remained more of a constant than peace in human history. Peace has often been the interregnum of wars, a time to prepare and launch another war. European countries have fought wars — with outsiders and with each other — for several centuries. The relative peace between World War II and now seems like a rare break from continued conflict and it looks like it is about to end.

History is likely repeat itself once again. Another war in Europe will be the most destructive ever. World War II took six million lives. The next will take several fold lives, because the weapons used would be so much more annihilating.

The next war will likely start as a consequence of a mistake or miscalculation between the main protagonists and rival powers rather than as a result of deliberate strategy.

Well, the dark clouds of war have begun to appear on the horizon already. The journey to this war seems to have started from Ukraine but it will blow up in the face of Europe as a whole.

In Ukraine, Western countries miscalculated the Russian interest and commitment. Consequently, they supported and propagated the Maidan uprising against the pro-Moscow President Yanukovych, who opposed integration with the European Union. Though Yanukovych was corrupt, he was legitimately elected.

Consequently, Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine and supported anti-Kiev rebels in eastern Ukraine. It has started increased military surveillance around its territories, alarming its immediate neighbors. It also failed to size up the Western reaction.

Yanukovych’s successor, Poroshenko, thought he could fight Russia, the regional hegemon, and seek a mutually acceptable modus vivendi keeping by his country’s best interest front and center.

In response, the United States, eager to undermine Russia in its backyard, offered military support to Kiev to squash the rebellion in eastern Ukraine; it has now sent military advisers. It has also moved its heavy weapons to Poland and Baltic states. Russia will not sit on its hands if the West threatens its vital interest at its door, as America would not in its neighborhood. Remember the Monroe Doctrine?

This is an invitation to war in Europe. There is no shortage of crazy people in Washington and Moscow that would want to destroy each other, even it means their own destruction.

In Washington, you have the Tea Party and Neo-cons zealots. Tea Party Republicans would not mind cutting their own nose to spite their own face if it hurts the Democratic Party.

They do not mind shutting down the US government or taking away health insurance of millions of Americans if it hurts Obama’s image. Who knows, extreme rightists like Senator Ted Cruz may sometime in the future could be an American president and do something crazy to go down in history.

The Neo-Cons are no better in their attitude. They would not mind letting many Americans die if it insures American supremacy or promotes the interests of Israel. The war in Iraq was their idea.

The Kremlin has its own crazy people — Silovikis. President Putin himself is a hawk. The Silovikis prop him up further. They will do anything to restore the lost Russian glory of the Soviet days and repeal attack on Russia physically or psychologically. Who replaces Putin could be even worse.

Although both sides say their preparations are defensive, I wish there could be a difference between offensive and defensive preparation. What is defensive could be turned into offensive or vice versa.

If push comes to shove, many analysts in the West believe, Moscow will first use nuclear weapons this time. That might be true. At the same time, the record shows that the Washington has been first to use such horrendous weapons — the use of first and the second nuclear weapon, the first use of napalm bomb, the first use of the bunker buster, and so on.

Two things often prompt Americans to be first in such overwhelming and disproportionate use of force: The availability of such technology and force and the sense of entitlement known as American exceptionalism. To sustain American superiority, Washington tries to pulverize the enemy quickly and decisively.

The same elements may prompt an American president to use a powerful nuclear bomb against Russia, hoping that the US defense shield would prevent the Russian weapons heading to its shores. Russia will certainly retaliate. The US defensive shield is not as foolproof as it is expected. It can never be. Some Russian nuclear weapons will land on their targets.

Such a nuclear exchange will not only demolish Russia and America, it will also destroy much of the rest of the world. Is this a crazy scenario that I have projected? You bet it is. But remember this: History has been full of crazy people.

If Changis Khan were not crazy, he would not have sent his fighters on horseback from China all the way to Hungary. I Alexander was not crazy, he would not have gone all the way to invade India from Istanbul. If the British were not crazy, they would not have sought to rule the world.

If Hitler were not crazy, he would not have started World War II. If Emperor Hirohito were not crazy, he would not have sought to control Asia during World War II. If Netanyahu were not crazy, he would not have dismissed the idea of two-state solution for Palestine.

There is only a small difference between being crazy and great. If crazy people succeed in their crazy goal, they are deemed as great. If they fail, they are deemed as insane. It is like being a terrorist and a revolutionary.

History is written by the victor. If Hitler had won World War II, he would have been elevated as a deity. Since he lost, he is demonized. Lenin was a hero for Communist Russia, but he became a villain of sorts after communism collapsed in his country.

Besides the crazy people we have, we also have an unprecedented toxicity in international relations now, more than what was observed during Cold War days. Together, they make anything possible. Would it be Barack Obama or Vladimir Putin to push the nuclear button? I do not know. But anyone could make a mistake or miscalculate the rival’s reaction.

If Washington and Moscow fight, they will sustain considerable damage. But they might not be necessarily obliterated due to their vast landmass and strategic depth. Europe has no such luxury. So it will the one to be obliterated if a major war erupts between the United States and Russia over Europe.

Europeans therefore should avert such an annihilation.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s